ADELAIDE GAOL HERITAGE
HER HISTORY AND HER STORIES 1841-1988
  • Home
  • History
    • Executions
    • Women in Gaol
    • Gaol Archaeology
  • People
    • Ladies >
      • Sarah Francisco
      • Mary Schippan
    • Rogues >
      • Ernest Ryan
    • The Executed >
      • List of Hangings
      • 1861-1883 >
        • John Seaver
    • Murderers >
      • John McGrath
      • Hori Morse
  • Ghosts
    • Ghost Stories
  • Contact
  • Gallery
    • Historical
  • Video
    • Historical
    • Media
    • Paranormal
    • Entertainment
  • Tours
  • Links
  • Blog

'Fitting Punishment for Big Cowards'

12/12/2016

1 Comment

 
cat o' nine tails floggings
Sydney Evening News - 2nd Sept 1893
ON THIS DAY...
12th Dec 1883


On this day two young lads, Samuel Moyle (15 years) and John Haggerty (17 years) received the first part of their sentence.  The two young men had committed separate, but identical crimes and both were sentenced by Justice Boucart.

Part of their sentence included strokes of the lash, to be carried out on the same day at the Adelaide Gaol.  They received their punishment on the morning of the 12th Dec.
Samuel Moyles
On the 16th August, Margaret Hayes (12 years) who lived in Willunga, left school and began to walk home.  Samuel on seeing Margaret, followed the little girl from her school, for the express purpose of gratifying himself with her.  He was quickly arrested and taken to court where Samuel pleaded guilty.  His Honour stated that it was terrible to see a boy charged with such an offence, and even exclaimed that he was astounded.  He pointed out that none the less, this boy had terribly injured this girl and in any other colony, the sentence would have meant death or Gaol for life.  Instead he sentenced Samuel to 1 month in Gaol, 15 lashes and then Samuel was to be kept in the boys reformatory until 16 years of age.

John Haggerty
On the 15th Nov, Mary Brewster (23) of Quorn, had been taking a message to a neighbour when she stumbled across John.  He grabbed her and after a severe struggle, he raped her.

Mary stated in court that she had seen John stop to give his horse a drink and when she got close to him, he had asked her the time.  She replied she did not exactly know and hurried on her way.  He quickly caught up to her and threw her down to the ground. 

“Do you not have a conscience?” Mary cried out during the violent struggle “No” he replied.  Once finished, John then got on his horse and rode off.

In the court her torn clothing, was produced.   Her neighbour attested to the state Mary was in when she finally arrived at her house, and said her face, ear and wrist were bleeding.

The jury only took a few minutes to find John guilty, but did ask for mercy due to his age. Justice Boucart once more reminded John that in other Colonies, he would have been given the death sentence before he sentenced John to 5 years hard labour and 20 lashes.

Whipping Rack - Adelaide Gaol Punishment
Whipping Rack - Adelaide Gaol Photo © Alison Oborn
Sentence Carried Out
On Weds morning, 12th December, in the presence of Mr Howell (Governor of the Gaol) and Dr Patterson (Colonial Surgeon), the strokes were given.  These were administered, as often done so, by the executioner, Earle.

Samuel was given the birch. “The castigation was administered on a tender part of the young scamp’s body, and he lustily yelled out as each stroke was given!”

John, as he was older and his crime more violent, was given the cat-o-nine tails. Even before the first stroke was given, he started to howl and pray for mercy, which turned to shrill yells as each stroke was given.  It was said “they could be almost heard as far as Bowden.”  He was described as a man of ‘robust physique and possessing lungs of extraordinary power!  He fainted part way through, but was soon brought back to consciousness with plenty of water.

It was viewed by the South Australian Weekly Chronicle, that the punishments were much deserved and if given more often, would deter ‘many big cowards’ from crimes of a similar nature!

Written by Alison Oborn
© Adelaide Gaol Heritage
www.adelaidegaolheritage.com.au
Sources
http://trove.nla.gov.au/
Newspapers of the day
Drawing courtesy Sydney Evening News 1883
1 Comment

John Balaban - Adelaide Gaol Execution 

26/8/2015

3 Comments

 

Was John Balaban our first Serial Killer?

Picture
On this day – 26th August 1953, John Balaban had the dubious honour of being the first person to be hanged in the newly converted Hanging Tower at the Adelaide Gaol. 

John Balaban was a 29 year old Rumanian, who was definitely not a stupid man. In fact he had obtained a degree as assistant engineer in physics and metallurgy when he was only 19 years old.  He joined the army in 1947 before escaping to France in 1948, where later he admitted to making his first kill - a woman he had strangled to death after “making love to her”.  Her murder remained unsolved until John Balaban made his confession five years later.

In 1952 he met and married Thelma Cadd, and lived with her, her mother and Thelma’s 6 year old stepson Phillip 
at the Sunshine Café in Gouger Street.  However, Balaban was becoming increasingly unhappy and blamed this unhappiness on his wife.  Finally on 3rd December 1952, he walked out. Only two days later, while drinking at the Royal Admiral Hotel on Hindley Street with some friends, Balaban met Zora Kusic and after a drink or two Zora invited Balaban back to her shack at Torrensville.  While in the cab, Zora made the fatal mistake of admitting to Balaban that she was in fact a prostitute, and then requested five pounds for her services.  Disgusted that she was just a ‘common prostitute’, he became enraged and strangled her, before cutting her throat with a knife and slitting her stomach and chest open.

Balaban was arrested and in January 1953, was sent to trial which only lasted 5 days, before he was released due to there not being enough evidence.  This fatal mistake cost the lives of three more innocent people.

Returning to his family in February, conditions did not improve and he became more and more unhappy until on the 11th April 1953, Balaban decided to go out for a drink and ended up attacking a young lady in a women's toilet block, taking an iron bar and assaulting others, even putting one in hospital with head injuries.  On returning back to the Café that night, briefly he wondered what his wife would say to him being dirty and covered in blood.  It was at that moment he decided to cure his unhappiness once and for all, took a claw hammer and beat his wife to death.  He didn’t stop with his wife, he continued his violent spree by taking the hammer to his mother-in-law and also to poor little phillip, both who survived their ordeal for a few days before finally succumbing to their injuries.  It was while attacking the girl who worked there, that she managed to escape by jumping out of a window and raised the alarm.  Balaban was arrested and taken to the Adelaide Gaol, tried and found guilty of the murder of Zora Kusic.  He was sentenced to hang by the neck until dead.

On the morning of the execution the police closed off Gaol Road, but they needn’t have worried, as the execution of John Balaban failed to incite even one member of the public to demonstrate against it.  It wasn’t just the public that had little sympathy for him, but he was unpopular with the guards too, especially as he had savagely attacked a prison warder, whom he tried to throttle before being overpowered.

John Balaban showed no remorse for what he had done, and stated that they deserved to die.  He even claimed that Philip was a mercy killing as he would otherwise have lived his life under a dark cloud.

At 8 a.m. on 26th August 1953, John Balaban became the 42nd person to be hanged in the Adelaide Gaol.
3 Comments

Murder: Not Guilty, but...

9/8/2015

1 Comment

 
The Adelaide Gaol - On this day, 9th August 1853…
Adelaide Gaol crime Arthur HorrocksArthur Horrocks - courtesy State Library South Australia
A young, stout looking lady nervously stood in the dock, with her head hung low and pleaded "Not guilty" to the murder that she was now accused of.

Fanny Port had been in the service of Arthur Horrocks, a farmer in Penwortham, Clare Valley, for around 4 months as cook and general servant. Arthur Horrocks was the brother of the famous explorer and pastoralist, John Ainsworth Horrocks.  


One morning, he found her crying and upon asking what was wrong, she stated that people were endeavouring to injure her good name by spreading rumours that she was pregnant.  Horricks tried to reassure her that if this was the case then she should be afforded help and all the attention she needed.  She thanked Horrocks for his kind offer, but refused to admit to the pregnancy. 

A little later, and still suspicious, Horrocks searched her room and found evidence to suggest that the rumours were true.  Fanny finally admitted to having already giving birth, and told him the baby had died and was buried only 50 yards from the house.  Worried that she had hurt the child, he asked her the question, to which she replied “Oh no, Sir, I would have kept it had it breathed” she also added “it was a very pretty little girl”.

Fanny took him to the spot where she had buried her baby and he marked the spot before sending word to the local Magistrate.  The police arrived and soon after exhumed the body, being careful not to damage it in any way.  The dead body of the child was quickly taken to Clare for examination.

Despite Fanny’s insistence that the child had not breathed when born, the examination by Dr Foster Steadman, showed otherwise.  They tested the lungs and they floated… a sure sign, he said, that the baby had been breathing before she died.  The valve in the heart was closed also, another sign that the baby had been alive when born, and that there had been circulation. 

The head was exhibiting discolouration from extensive bruising and the scalp was swollen.  After removing the scalp, the examiner found blood on the skull from internal bleeding which, he believed would have been the cause of death.  He did not consider that such damage would be done through childbirth, but would have to be delivered by blows from a blunt source, possibly knuckles.  He could not find anything else to account for the child’s death. 

Mr Parker, for the defence, argued that no child's cry had been heard and that Mr Horricks had witnessed only weeks earlier, Fanny preparing clothing for her child.  He pointed out that she had always been of a kindly disposition towards other people’s children and that it would be out of character for her to ever harm a child, never mind her own.  He reminded the jury of Fanny’s comment, said with fondness “it was a pretty little girl”.  He put to the jury, if there was any doubt at all in their minds, they must not find her guilty of murder but that the crime of concealment would be more fitting.

With that, the Jury retired and returned with the verdict of Not Guilty of murder, but guilty of concealment, which was in those days, a crime in itself.

Mr Justice Cooper proceeded to pass sentence in a low and solemn tone.

“Fanny Port, you have been vindicated for the wilfull murder of your own child; the jury have acquitted you of that dreadful crime, but found you guilty of the lesser offence of concealment” he continued by reminding her that “Had the Jury been compelled to have found you guilty of infanticide, it would have been incumbent on me to pronounce the sentence of death upon you, and having done so I would have no power to avert it.  You would have been taken from where you now stand, and, in a few days, at the place of public execution, your life would have paid the penalty of the dreadful offence charged to you.”

He reminded her that a kind offer of help had been offered, and that her refusal of that help, had no doubt contributed to the death of her child.  For this reason he felt that he should give maximum sentence for the crime she had been found guilty of. On the 9th August 1853 Fanny Port was sent to the Adelaide Gaol for 2 years, with hard labour.

Written by Alison Oborn
© Adelaide Gaol Heritage
www.adelaidegaolheritage.com.au
Sources
http://trove.nla.gov.au/
Newspapers of the day
Photo © Alison Oborn for Adelaide Gaol Heritage


1 Comment

    Author

    Alison Oborn, Adelaide Author and award winning tour operator, is also a history & heritage enthusiast. She has been a volunteer guide, Information Officer and Researcher at the Adelaide Gaol since 2002.  

    Alison also loves a good mystery, and authored her book 'Ghosts of the Past' on the 10 years of paranormal research that her and her team, Paranormal Field Investigators conducted at the Adelaide Gaol.  She also runs
    Adelaide's Haunted Horizons Ghost Tours, which operate Ghost Tours and Dark History Tours in the Adelaide Gaol, at Z Ward, National Railway Museum, Tailem Town, Adelaide Arcade, Moonta and Burra.

    Archives

    February 2017
    December 2016
    August 2016
    August 2015

    Categories

    All
    On This Day...

    RSS Feed

Home   History    People    Ghosts    Contact   Gallery   Video   Links   Tours  Blog
© Adelaide Gaol Heritage Site - 2014.  No reproduction of any material  on this site to be used without permission.